Blog Archives

The Subway Guy Goes To Prison

The former spokesman for the Subway chain of sandwich shops sat in an Indianapolis courtroom Thursday morning waiting for the ax to fall on life as he knew it. Once worth fifteen million, Jared Fogle, who became famous for losing over 200lbs on a diet of Subway sandwiches and exercise, was about to plead guilty and be sentenced on charges related to his predilection for kiddie porn and young prostitutes.

After he entered his plea Jared’s lawyers called two witnesses. The first witness, a Canadian psychiatrist, testified by phone that Fogle exhibited “mild pedophilia”, a diagnosis which does not exist in U.S. according to the defense’s second witness, Dr Rick May.

The government then put a detective on the stand to read from some of Jared’s text messages where he was seeking to procure juveniles for sex. “Did you find some young girls or boys?” Fogle texted to an 18 year-old prostitute saying he would pay $400 for someone 16 or younger, more if their age could be documented.

The government and defense then sparred over the extent to which “the Subway guy” was culpable in the harm he caused and the danger he remains to children. Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven DeBrota said Fogle did nothing to stop the child pornography created by his partner-in-crime and director of The Jared Foundation, Russell Taylor, but rather participated “enthusiastically”.

When it was the turn of the defense, Jeremy Margolis, argued that Jared “traded a horrible food addiction for a horrible sex addiction.” He said Fogle has seen the “crashing and burning of his life” but is committed to getting well.

Then it was Jared’s turn to address the court.

“Where do I even try to begin, your honor? For most of my adult life, I’ve been in the spotlight, trying to be a positive role model for others,” Fogle said. “I became dependent on alcohol, pornography and prostitutes” he continued, apologizing to his victims as he wiped away a tear.

Judge Tanya Walton Pratt went beyond the prosecutions recommendation of twelve and a half years saying, “the level of perversion and lawlessness exhibited by Mr. Fogle is extreme,” imposing a sentence of 188 months.

In this last unfinished sketch Jared Fogle is seen removing his jacket, tie and belt before marshals handcuff him. He blew a kiss and waved to friends and family members before being led out of the courtroom.

Jared Fogle Plea & Sentencinga

Posted in Courtroom Tagged with: , , , , ,

SCOTUS In The Cold

Even the turtles holding up the Bronze lamps on the Supreme Court plaza seemed to want to pull in their heads from today’s frigid temperatures.

Inside, the Justices heard arguments in two puzzling cases.The first, Paroline v. U.S., presented the Court with the problem of apportioning restitution to victims of child pornography. In this digital age, where the same image can be downloaded by many participants in the sexual exploitation of a child, to what extent is each viewer responsible for the humiliation and damage suffered?The lawyer for the victim, Utah law professor Paul Cassell, in this case insisted that each perpetrator should be responsible for the entire $3.4 million award. “You’re not claiming – or are you” asked Justice Kagan, “that she’s been victimized to the tune of $3.4 million as a result of this particular defendant’s offense?”

“He contributed to the entire amount,” said Cassell.

The second case, Abramski v. U.S., concerns the so-called “Straw Purchaser” law that is supposed to prevent sales to those not entitled to own firearms, such as convicted felons, by requiring gun dealers to have buyers fill out a form. The form asks, ”Are you the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm listed on this form?”Justice Breyer, pictured above on the left, known for often posing convoluted hypotheticals had an esoteric analysis of the term ‘Straw Purchaser’. “It comes from ‘straw bail’,” he told petitioner’s lawyer, RichardDietz, “where someone else put up the bail and it was called straw because the people who made a career of that used to wear straw in their shoes. Interesting.”

“He made that up,” Justice Scalia interjected.

Lyle Denniston’s analyses of the arguments are here, and here.

Posted in Arguments, Supreme Court Tagged with: , , , , ,
TWITTER @courtartist

Blog Updates

Enter your name and email below to receive blog updates via email.