Blog Archives

Anchors Aweigh

6a00d8341cd0df53ef017c35defc1d970b-800wi
A group of Navy lawyers picked the right day, yesterday, to be sworn in to the Supreme Court bar. ┬áThe first case argued, Levi v. United States, involved a malpractice and medical battery suit against a Navy surgeon. But first, the Court had an opinion to announce that might have touched on Admiralty law, but didn’t.
6a00d8341cd0df53ef017d400e1c57970c-800wi

In Lozman v. Riviera Beach the Supreme Court ruled that a houseboat is not a vessel subject to maritime law. In his opinion┬áJustice Stephen Breyer noted that not every floating structure is a vessel. “To state the obvious, a wooden washtub, a plastic dishpan, a swimming platform on pontoons … or Pinocchio (when inside the whale) are not ‘vessels’”, Breyer said, “even if they are ‘artificial contrivances’ capable of floating, moving under tow, and incidentally carrying even a fair-sized item or two when they do so.”

The Court also heard arguments in a “takings” case, Koontz v. St. Johns River, of which I’ve posted a sketch below.
6a00d8341cd0df53ef017d400e586b970c-800wi

Not sure why the lawyer for the petitioner looks so happy. According to Lyle the argument did not seem to go his way.

Lyle Denniston’s take on the “takings” case here.

Posted in Arguments, Opinions, Supreme Court Tagged with: , ,
2013_Blawg100Honoree_300x300
TWITTER @courtartist

Blog Updates

Enter your name and email below to receive blog updates via email.