The Supreme Court this afternoon heard arguments on Michigan’s “Proposal 2”, a voter-approved law that forbids the use of race in college admissions, as well as public employment and contracting. The case is Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (note that I’ve labeled my drawings “Schuette v. BAMN” because it’s shorter. BAMN stands for “By Any Means Necessary”, and comes from the challenger’s full title, Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary). But enough from me. Here are the sketches.
Lyle Denniston has the full story here.
Amazing sketches! I love the hand gesture of the lady on the last one. And how the judge in the middle looks at her. You are so good! Did you do the color right there in the courtroom?
Thank you, Julia. At the Supreme Court add color after the argument when I’m in the pressroom, but sometimes if there is a second argument I’ll stay in the courtroom and apply watercolor there. I use these handy waterbrushes that have the water in the handle.