Justices Question Animal Cruelty Law

SC091006wide

Ten years ago Congress passed a law banning video and other depictions of animal cruelty, but the Supreme Court is likely to decide that the law is too broad and vague.

SC091006_Alito

Justice Alito was the only Justice who seemed inclined to support the law. In response to a lawyer’s argument that historically depictions of animal cruelty have been under the umbrella of the First Amendment, he suggested that technology may have removed some of that protection.

Justice Alito: Well, isn’t that due to changes in technology?  Before people could watch videos at home, this sort of thing would be very difficult.

SC091006_Millett

Attorney Patricia Millett: This covers photographs, . . . .  I’m not sure it wouldn’t cover sketch artists or a hieroglyphic, for all I know.

Justice Alito: And is there – - – in the real world is there a market for sketches of dog fights?

 

WaPo story here.

Browse the Image Archive
About

Courtartist is me, Art Lien. I've been sketching the courts since 1976, and for most of that time the U.S. Supreme Court has been my regular beat. I've been working almost exclusively for NBC News since 1980. Courtroom sketching is a form of visual journalism or reportage drawing that is slowly dying out. Where once upon a time news organization each had their own artist covering a story, today a "pool" artist often sketches for all. It is a demanding and stressful discipline where the drawing is often done directly and under tight deadline.

Posted in Arguments, Supreme Court Tagged with:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

2013_Blawg100Honoree_300x300
TWITTER @courtartist

Blog Updates

Enter your name and email below to receive blog updates via email.